Tracking ID UA-126977798-1
Before the 1990's there was a movement both in the social and economic sectors in most western countries to promote "Family Friendly" policies, places and products. In previous decades children were not often taken or permitted to be by themselves in public spaces such as restaurants, airports, political demonstrations, workplaces, or establishments where there was "adult entertainment". Businesses would advertise, "family friendly" meaning children were 'welcome' to accompany adults. Then in a shift in tactic, and a not so subtle pivot from incorporating and promoting "families" to emphasis only on "the children" - advertising/media focused their message to be simply, "child friendly" locations, policies and consumer goods.
In fact in 1996, the United Nations Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) came out with an ambitious program and numerous research papers on a project they titled: Child Friendly Cities Initiative. This was under a larger more ambitious world wide design they had created for the entire planet called: "The 2030 Agenda".
Based on research indicating that by 2015, over four billion of the world's population would be living in urban areas, and of those one third or approximately 1,333,333,333 would be/are children; and reviewing data that projected by 2050, 70% of the planet's population would be living in urban areas/cities and if the current trends continued, at least half of those children would be living below the poverty line and many would be living in slums; UNICEF proposed an initiative which supports municipal governments through funding and "advising" to work toward a number of goals for improving their cities with a focus on the needs of children.
One of the first countries to sign on to this initiative was Italy in 1996. Italy had been known as one of the more "child oriented and child friendly" countries in the world at that point. Part of the "child friendly" programs centered on safe spaces for sports and recreation. (see photo below) Securing areas so they are protected from traffic, (by barriers, fences, walls, tunnels) as well as providing access to clean water and clean air, are/were priorities for Italy. These were ideal aims to motivate other countries signing on to the program.
The project includes "youth councils" connected to UNICEF where children are "encouraged to participate in activities and report on violations or problem areas in their cities, which affect children". There are apps children can download to their phones to send information/evidence into a UNICEF cluster. For a more in depth analysis of the 2030 goals/endgames, click on this link: www.activistpost.com/2015/09/agenda-2030-translator.html
UNICEF sponsors conferences and forums for "youth in cities" and provides funding for attending workshops for youth from different parts of the world. UNICEF collects data from their "youth ambassadors" in "child friendly cities" projects which conduct surveys, compile photos, documents, present policy actions for analysis by United Nations and UNICEF staff. "To promote child participation, the National Committee of UNICEF's Child Friendly City Initiative is also working on an innovative project with the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT). The project’s aim is to include adolescents in the development of the next national survey (2019) to help collect information on the behaviour of boys and girls aged between 10 and 19 years living in Italy. The data will be aggregated to show the situation of children living at the city level." childfriendlycities.org/italy/
While on the surface, all these activities appear positive and proactive, the underlying and concurrent schemes involve directing children's attention (and allegiance) from their families, primary caregivers, community members, teachers, religious elders and authorities to a "global organization" for reporting, confiding and addressing their individual and local concerns. It does not mention privacy, bias, respect for traditional customs/culture, or age appropriate tasks and responsibilities sensitive to local beliefs. Is this really so different from countries or movements whose leaders use technology to command reporting and allegiance to the state and/or their form of government/dictatorship/theocracy? www.wired.co.uk/article/china-study-the-great-nation-app
The deliberate shift from family or local community connections to a much larger, complex and impersonal organization actually diminishes the voice and individuality and unique significance of a child. The child is early on regarded as an "asset"...or not. There can be thousands or millions just like her/him. This is not "child friendly" this is global new world order friendly-programming children to their needs while disregarding developmental stages. The child's needs are viewed to be subordinate to their data industrial complex (DIC) priorities. This is not done from a basis of caring, responsiveness or love. Children are used as agents of the United Nations through UNICEF. Their mission is advertised and disseminated as a worthwhile and even an "urgent" objective. Who dares oppose or object to an international, multicultural initiative?! There is considerable pressure, especially on children, to "go with the flow", conform and passively consent to the strongest narratives. But, this is fundamentally "anti child" in a move to condition children to respond first to a multinational organization for challenges in their local communities. The "change agent" here is the United Nations via children.
In the past few years, in mostly western "developed" nations, there has been pressure exerted on families, schools, societies to accept completely unscientific or medically proved concepts regarding gender biology. Children are being deliberately "cross dressed", pumped full of pharmaceutical drugs to alter their behavior and physiology, paraded on media as eroticized, created, "intersectional" creatures, flaunted in adult entertainment clubs, bars and lounges and exploited for political, economic and adult egocentric motives. They are being used as "assets" for commercial, political, economic and some might say, for "satanic" purposes. "Leftist ideology regarding transgenderism not only contradicts existing progressive doctrines (feminism), but is also literally false. Do not ever apologize for rejecting their unscientific hogwash. This noisy .001% of the population is sick and should not be allowed to dictate to the rest of us. You are being ordered to believe in a fairy tale—the idea that a dog can transform into a cat if it just wishes for it hard enough—and this is where the danger lies." www.reaxxion.com/10078/why-we-need-to-fight-against-transgender-acceptance
Their individuality, natural developmental stages, normal curiosity, observational skills and privacy have been twisted to make them into unwitting "change agents" for the interests and investments of those who plot to disrupt and confuse the next generations by forcing "acceptance" of this anti-child agenda including an imposed censorship on speech and critical thinking. No matter if the predominant indoctrination includes racism (Black Lives Matter movement), Islamic caliphate extremism,(Jihad) Neo Nazism or gang credos-children are the most vulnerable to be victims and purveyors of the presiding belief systems they are brought up and surrounded with, by the society they are born into. www.wnd.com/2016/05/whats-really-behind-americas-transgender-mania/
As parents, children are our most precious and treasured loved ones. As societies one would hope children would be considered our most important "resource", yet increasingly, nations are devaluing children as children. More and more, countries are transforming into "anti child" nations. In this regard it is important to re-read Ayn Rand's prophetic observations and warnings: “The uncontested absurdities of today are the accepted slogans of tomorrow. They come to be accepted by degrees, by precedent, by implication, by erosion, by default, by dint of constant pressure on one side and constant retreat on the other—until the day when they are suddenly declared to be the country’s official ideology.”
Fortunately, there are some societies and countries which encourage children to be individual, strong and resourceful as they go through the stages of human development. These countries are working on different initiatives for children. The "Forest Schools" were founded in the 1950s in Scandinavia. These schools have spread to a few other countries. Here is a short video report about this true "child friendly" initiative in education. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jkiij9dJfcw
Certainly it is easier to care for and educate children in rural areas outside crowded cities, in countries which have a robust economy and a literate citizenry; but it is also imperative that a society or nation value healthy and capable children. There are diverse ways of viewing children in our world. Not all societies see children as a national treasure, or feel a noble and moral duty to cherish them, to view them as irreplaceable rather than as commodities, cogs, cannon fodder or slaves in their ever expanding empire. (see map below) Values are not global or immutable.
For those of you, dear readers, who have, love and/or work with children, I salute you and urge you to be alert to these "programs", social engineering agendas and "global initiatives"-the cons and the pros-for the sake of our next generations. Included is a link to a video I highly recommend which discusses one of the more powerful psychological operations conducted on children and therefore all of society: www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_RtHctpV1A
From the Lone Star State until next week,